|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
268
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 15:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hi!
It's me again, the ugly duckling stuck in puberty with no chance of ever becoming a beautifull swan!
As you who know me know, there's always an introduction completely disconnected with what I am actually talking about. I guess this thread isn't really different.
Please note that a TL;DR is provided at the end of the post.
Every single one of you still is encouraged to donate to the ... ... "Save the World from my face" rescue fond so I can resculpt.
You'll do the community a service! You are doing this more for yourself than for me!
That's it already. On to the topic.
So I've heard there's this thing called Anti Ganking and besides it's seriously stupid name I wanted to know more about it.
What I know can be summed up in a few lines.
There's a chatroom for these people, but I don't know the name. It would be pointless anyway as I can safely assume that it's full of spies.
Smart move, btw, having a pointless public chatroom for people to build trust and then violate it when it's necessary.
Btw... do you like my black hair? I was always more the redhead guy... guy :( ...
So... what do they do?
I can make a few assumptions to fill this post.
Some AntiGankers are probably self righteous delusionalists. (is that even a word? I like it) It means that they believe to be the moral highground and everyone who isn't as good as them ... ... or doesn't agree with them ... ... is somehow bad/etc.
These are bad. Actually worse than most gankers.
I can guess that it's those who sit at stations, waiting for a ganker to undock and then proclaim SUCCESS!!! MY GREATEST ACHIEVEMENT!!!! (read this in a slight russian accent, aka Dexters Laboratory) if they manage to shoot one before he docks or when he undocks.
Okay...
So I wonder about if there are people who can actually be taken seriously. So not these types or Gevlon Goblin types. No, I don't read his blog.
I have tried once and then needed to visit reddits eyebleach subreddit, plus a full day of playing chess at hard level to make sure I'll regain the braincells lost during reading it. I'm just kidding, but I really can't take him seriously. Maybe he doesn't want to be taken seriously, though.
I can't say I like or dislike you, but your PR manager is an idiot, or in other words... YOU ARE DOING IT WRONG! *cough*
Please note that I have no idea if he is still at it. Thanks.
SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooo............ (Darth Vader)
What's the goal? What are they trying to protect? Miners only or other ships too? System wide action? Whole constellations? Are there "protected" regions? Is there a group with actually larger following? Any religious RP types? Only self righteous losers or actually people who can be taken seriously? Are there actual PR efforts and if so, why don't I know of it?
Thank you for all the information and detail you can provide. Yes, I am serious.
(I lied about the TL;DR)
|

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
268
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 15:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Hevymetal wrote:TL;DR
Don't waste your time reading.
The fight between Anti and gankers happens everywhere. You will find all types of people in Eve. The goal of the Antis is to stop ganking. The goal of the gankers is to gank. There's the New Order. What's the opposite?
Is there any? |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
268
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 15:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:A chance to gank the gankers? Where can I go to sign up?? Ganking the gankers?
No... that's pointless.
Do you like tears? |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
268
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 15:58:00 -
[4] - Quote
Thellero Orlenard wrote:TL;DR Solecist Project wrote:1. What's the goal? 2. What are they trying to protect? Miners only or other ships too? 3. System wide action? Whole constellations? Are there "protected" regions? 4. Is there a group with actually larger following? 5. Any religious RP types? 6. Only self righteous losers or actually people who can be taken seriously? 7. Are there actual PR efforts and if so, why don't I know of it?
1. Either "justified" murder or "protect the carebears, they're human too!" 2. I dunno, I would say carebears because they're great targets 3. See 4. 4. I'm not sure, there's probably some groups that go and protect the carebears, I would say it's more like the type of "group" the hackers manifesto refers to. To quote, The Mentor wrote:I am a Hacker, and this is my manifesto. You may stop this individual, but you can't stop us all. After all... we're all alike.
So I suppose it's more of an idea of free carebears and each individual just eliminating the gankers when they can. 5. Like crusaders? I dunno. 6. You may be able to find a few serious people. I plan to start SBing them on my main soon, I'm in it for the highsec kills though. 7. PR? If that means player rights, you have the right to HTFU, use your kill right and go -censored for fear of ban-. Thank you for your post.
PR is Public Relations. Like James does it or like Goblin fails at it.
You plan on discoing? Who where what?
|

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
268
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 16:14:00 -
[5] - Quote
Herzyr wrote:So does this mean that gankers are anti gankers at the same time? They gank targets before other gankers gank them? Or do they gank would be gankers before they gank a not ganker?
It's like stealing, finding something for someone before they lose it, was it that way or the other way around? I myself want to know more. |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
268
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 16:22:00 -
[6] - Quote
Dreadchain wrote:I have a few of these "anti-gankers" following me around as I go on with my ganking business. They tend to limit their activities to insults in local chat, as well as sitting outside stations in cheap frigates trying to tackle me before I warp away.
Most commonly they claim I am actually a sadistic transvestite psychopath who gets off on the misery of others. I'd post some of the chatlogs, but I fear they may have far too much foul language for the audience of this fine forum. Thank you for your contribution! If you could tell where this is happening, it'd be nice.
I know this type btw and mentioned it in my initial post.
|

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
269
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 16:36:00 -
[7] - Quote
voetius wrote: I once podded Gevlon (I think it was Botslayer Goblin but can't recall TBH) so does that make me an anti-ganker or a ganker?
I think for many this makes you a good person. ^^ |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
269
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 16:37:00 -
[8] - Quote
Thellero Orlenard wrote:Solecist Project wrote: Thank you for your post.
PR is Public Relations. Like James does it or like Goblin fails at it.
You plan on discoing? Who where what?
I have no idea what Public Relations is or who Goblin is... PR. Marketing.
Can't really tell you much about Gevlon. |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
269
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 16:43:00 -
[9] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Anti-gankers try to stop gankers (like the name suggests). The better ones use ECM to drop a gankers targets mid-gank so they get concorded for nothing, but some do run around shooting at gankers where they can. There are chat channels and they are full of spies, but for the most part the channels are there to exchange info, like gankers alts for warpins and whatnot and some areas where gankers are operating, etc. There's not much spies can do in those channels as all info is taken with a pinch of salt, it just gives a central location to pool info. Thanks for this.
Nothing new, but that's okay.
Are there any actual serious ones too or only those who restrict themselves to miner protection?
I consider this to be pointless rbh, but can't exclude them from information gathering. |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
269
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 16:45:00 -
[10] - Quote
Sibyyl wrote:The Red Queen is alive and well in EVE. If you have more cautious penguins who can spot a brown polar bear from a distance, eventually the system will present a white polar bear. I think it's one of the most beautiful things in the game (besides the complexity). /F’” Even for my taste that's more meta than I can handle. lol |
|

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
269
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 17:12:00 -
[11] - Quote
Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:I never see him any more, but a guy called The Saint Tsero used to cause us some trouble in his Falcon. He was amazingly good at figuring out which miner we were going to gank even when using cloaky warpins. There were a couple of others, but since he was always around when they were, I assume they were his alts, but could be wrong. But if The Saint was around, ganking miners was going to be a lot tougher. I think his secret was that he was just as dedicated as we are. He wasn't thinking about the isk/hr he was losing by sitting in his Falcon for hours. He didn't start watching youtube videos just because there wasn't any action for 10min. And above all, I think he did it because it was fun, not because he was really interested in helping miners. Interesting.
Never heard of him.
Dedication is important. I think that's the whole point of the game, if you want to play it for what it has to offer.
What strikes me a bit is that it seems that people think that the only ganking that's happening is against miners. That's a bit odd.
I consider that to be the most irrelevant of them all. |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
271
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 17:54:00 -
[12] - Quote
Artemis Lyserius wrote:I've been for some time now hunting gate campers with some friends.
They're all quite stupid and their spots easily predictable, but their rage is twice the regular carebear rage.
So I'm guessing anti-gankers are just looking for the same: Gankers tears, which are probably twice as tasty as carebears tears.
Sincerely, it amazes me how players took so long in this game to start an initiative against such easy prey In ... highsec?
If so, how do you operate?
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:There's a guy in this character's corp who has been creating all manner of epic lulz by popping people with killrights on them, getting Tornado kills in scanning ships and the like.
Funnier than hell if you ask me. Can you tell me more about it??
|

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
271
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 17:55:00 -
[13] - Quote
PrettyMuch Always Right wrote:Pretty sure every ganker, griefer, AWOXer and pirate in EVE right now is ashamed to be remotely associated with the OP. Rule of thumb: If you can't present your ideas intelligibly, keep your thoughts to yourself.  Then why in hell do you even post, if you can't stick to your own rule of thumb? |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
271
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 18:07:00 -
[14] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Well... you have to kind of expect this, what with so many people ganking anymore. I've encountered a lot of "anti-gankers"... a lot of times it's people who are gankers themselves trying to discourage competition. When the gankers on my gate get too thick, I'll do the same. Float 200km off the gate in a cloaked hauler so I can ninja their kill... switch my Tornado to "kill yellow flashy" mode to pop their loot grabber. No matter what you do in eve, there's going to be someone out there who just wants to f*** up your game. There's always that push and pull, in everything. It's fine. For every tactic there's a counter tactic, and for every counter tactic there's yet another counter tactic. No sense crying about it. Just adapt and try to destroy your enemies. Your post is a bit weird and sounds more like a personal issue than actually adressing my questions. :)
Anyhow, thanks for your contribution, Gogela. |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
271
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 18:09:00 -
[15] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Solecist Project wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:There's a guy in this character's corp who has been creating all manner of epic lulz by popping people with killrights on them, getting Tornado kills in scanning ships and the like.
Funnier than hell if you ask me. Can you tell me more about it?? http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_ext_id=92680254This guy has a knack for sniffing out hilarious kills. And man, you should hear his accent. I like this guy! :D
Anslo wrote:I forget his name, but this guy in Caldari space sits on highsec gates in a battle skiff and tackles any red blinkies he finds. Ive watched him point 2 catalysts at a time, tank them, and kill them. Battle skiff.
Interesting! Huge tank, if I recall correctly? Really nice!
Too bad you forgot his name. :D |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
272
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 18:20:00 -
[16] - Quote
Mina Sebiestar wrote:I was traveling on ap in my cheetah from jita to hek and got pwned on gate for probe launcher. Sit in crapy staber (before it got drones) get back there and pwned trashers left and right for day or so.
gankers wore -10 so limited time to undock and warp to gank target and me being there with sensor boosted staber rly pissed em off but they started to cry like babies when I start hitting their loot scoop boat.
ah the tears, and ppl think carebears emo rage you should seen local chat that day.
also to log in pvp alt to pwn isbox ganker sure why not but I dont believe theres a service type group lurking around. Hahahaha I can imagine.
Yeah gankers tears are sometimes far worse than carebear tears.
Especially if it's noobs who believe they are somehow better, but then manage to get themselves killed. No offense to you intended.
Sometimes carebears and gankers are far more alike than one would imagine.
|

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
273
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 18:37:00 -
[17] - Quote
Anslo wrote:I don't think they had a formal name, but I remember this group who roamed jita in battle indys and ganked gankers while repping gank targets up and escorting them to safety.
Vigilante bears, best bears. I'm impressed ......... It's kind of sad that these stories don't get known more publicly.
Haedonism Bot wrote:The Anti-ganker channel is called Anti-ganking. It's an open channel, so feel free to join but expect to be perma-banned the first time you open your mouth to say anything other than "grrr gankers". Your assessment of the channel was right on - at any given moment there are about 20 of the self righteous "gankers are bad people in real life" crowd, and the other hundred or so people are ganker alts, there to spy and to have a chuckle at the silly bears. Well I found one of these channels and it's locked. Invitation only.
"Yours", though, is open.
Makes me wonder.
Thanks! |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
273
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 18:55:00 -
[18] - Quote
Serene Repose wrote:What a serious waste of bandwidth this is. Though, it's kind of interesting to read something by a narcissist with an insecurity complex. Well, up to the fourth or fifth sentence anyway.
We're going to have to hike this bad boy up to four Yawns; yawn yawn yawn yawn. It doesn't rate a scratch. I'm even wondering why I allowed it to delay my second cup of coffee. You should look up what psychological projection is.
Anslo wrote:^That's why people don't bother posting anti-gank stories, Sol. *nods*
It's sad, but people shouldn't let themselves get discouraged by haters. |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
273
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 19:25:00 -
[19] - Quote
bareface wrote:I have done a bit of anti ganking. It's actually quite fun. I don't go looking for gankers, but when the opportunity arises...
I usually bait gankers sitting on a gate catching pimped mission runners.
If they have a scanning alt outside of a station, I load up a golem with as many faction and deadspace modules as possible. After I've been scanned, I'll pretend to run a mission or 2 in system (just warp someplace and sit a while). Usually when I return to the station, the scanning alt is gone ( heading to a gate to scoop up the loot of my soon dead golem). I then refit in station with an all tank setup and lots of tractors/salvagers in the highs. I then use an agent locater to find out which adjacent system gate they are camping. It's then as easy as flying through the gate and scooping up the wrecks of 3-5 tornados. An easy 50 mil for 10 minutes work.
Just like ganking, anti ganking doesn't have to be about the tears. It can be quite profitable. Awesome! :D
You are doing it right! :D
May I ask where this happens/happened? |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
273
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 20:30:00 -
[20] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Is there a group with actually larger following? If by "larger following" you mean guys with 100 accounts than "yes". Pod Repo might count too...
Any religious RP types? Yah. They play WAY too much internet spaceships.
Only self righteous losers or actually people who can be taken seriously? How seriously can you take anyone playing video games? All of the above.
Are there actual PR efforts and if so, why don't I know of it? No. That's a far better response. Thank you.
You're saying that there are isboxing antigankers around?
What's Pod Repo? |
|

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
274
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 20:37:00 -
[21] - Quote
MotherSammy wrote:Oh the anti-ganking channel. That's the place where every new order alt hangs out with a bunch of AFK miners. Yeah that's pretty much a no-brainer. :)
Also ... Hi! Nice of you to post here! :D |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
275
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 22:07:00 -
[22] - Quote
Agondray wrote:i tried to gank the gankers, when they realize someone with guns is after them they dock.....and stay docked, because apparently its not fair Then I guess you got lucky with finding noobs who don't really know what to do.
Still ... +1 for the effort. |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
275
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 22:12:00 -
[23] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Solecist Project wrote:
It's sad, but people shouldn't let themselves get discouraged by haters.
Especially not the gankers. After all, besides Goons, who gets more hate in this game than gankers? That's true.
Gankers are the single most hated beings ... unless we can turn that somehow around.
Imagine we could make gankers hate anti-gankers so much, they start whinethreads on the forums about how unfair things are etc etc.
... wouldn't that be hilarious? :D |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
279
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 23:24:00 -
[24] - Quote
Winchester Steele wrote:Agondray wrote:i tried to gank the gankers, when they realize someone with guns is after them they dock.....and stay docked, because apparently its not fair Or.. Or.. They stay docked because they are -10 and facpo will murder them if they stay undocked. Sorry to burst your bubble, but NOONE is "scared" of you.  Well most do that anyway until their alts find targets, but otoh instaundocks make undocking almost too safe.
And myself never really had issues with avoiding the faction police and I hate using alts to make my game easier.
Alyth Nerun wrote:From what I have seen so far, the most distinct skills of a typical Anti-ganker are as follows:
- Can sit for hours on undock and try to catch insta-undocking ships or insta-docking pods - Can make up stuff about your real life on the fly - Is a skilled psycho analyst and can asses immediately that your are a sociopath because you shot spaceships in a game about shooting spaceships. - Is willing to share his sexual fantasies about the ganker, usually involving a lot of male reproduction organs and/or fecal matter of all sorts in local chat
It is however not required to do anything of impact in the game itself, like stopping ganks and stuff like that.
(Just to be fair, there is a very very small minority in the anti ganker "community" who isn't like that and at least tries)
There's a certain truth to this, but I'm unsure of the size of this group. There seems to be a real scene regarding this and although there's a noticeable lack of experience in ganking, most seem to do quite well.
Yes, next to this thread I already started personal research. :D |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
279
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 23:25:00 -
[25] - Quote
Quote:Yes there definitely are isboxers... anytime you see a swarm of tornadoes or catalysts with the same name appended with a number (1-100) you can bet some isboxer is ganking freighters. Pod Repo ...you'll get to know them if you fly around empire w/ a low sec status, a cheap bounty, suspect flag, or a killright someone sold. Pod Repo pretty much finds any excuse they can to kill you w/o going full berserker. There are some others like them too... Interesting! |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
279
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 23:36:00 -
[26] - Quote
Winchester Steele wrote:I still remember your experiments living as an outlaw in high-sec remaining undocked using bm's. Was gonna mention it. Tried it for a while on my -10, found it frustrating trying to post on the forums in 10 second intervals. (Although most of my shitposts take less time than that anyhow  ) Woohoo I'm being remembered! xD
Well I can tell you that chatting was the one thing that got me killed the most! lol
If you want it a bit less challenging... use a slasher fitted with local hull overdrives, a mwd and overheat whenever the facpo spawns next to you.
Works up to 0.7 or 0.8 - I don't really remember - like a charme.
As soon as you're 50km away you're safe to zoom around! WEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!! XD
And high speed frigate fights with artillery as -10 are awesome! :D |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
281
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 00:00:00 -
[27] - Quote
MotherSammy wrote:Solecist Project wrote:MotherSammy wrote:Oh the anti-ganking channel. That's the place where every new order alt hangs out with a bunch of AFK miners. Yeah that's pretty much a no-brainer. :) Also ... Hi! Nice of you to post here! :D What an odd line. Do you know me from somewhere?  No, but I irritated you successfully with it! XD
Hasikan Miallok wrote:I know someone that makes quite a living following a particular 'nado gang around. He doesn't kill the 'nados though just the ships that turn up after the gank, then he steals the loot. They even offered to pay him to stop harassing them. That's ... awesome!
I mean ... seriously. This guy steals loot from gankers and they even offer to PAY him to stop doing it!
HILARIOUS! :D |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
281
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 00:01:00 -
[28] - Quote
Winchester Steele wrote:Hasikan Miallok wrote:I know someone that makes quite a living following a particular 'nado gang around. He doesn't kill the 'nados though just the ships that turn up after the gank, then he steals the loot. They even offered to pay him to stop harassing them. Sounds like a griefer to me. Hopefully the 'nado pilots don't come unglued and report your friend for "cyber bullying"  He's seriously ****** if they report him to ****** peg.
Damn, I always forget how to spell his name properly. |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
281
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 02:28:00 -
[29] - Quote
Apparently they banned me from minerbumping channel.
Person even lacks balls to admit it.
My heart is broken.
I will go cry myself to sleep now. :(
The password is 315, btw.
Send my best wishes!
Good night ! :D
|

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
284
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 09:22:00 -
[30] - Quote
I have no coffee pads at home. I am completely unwilling to heat up water right now and now I'm drinking ice coffee. Cold milk and powder. No coffee pads. I know I haven't drank one of these in half a year, but when it matters THEY REALLY SHOULD BE AROUND!
The horror ...............................
Anyway, good morning. Don't let this affect how you read my post.
I'm not yet pissed off.
admiral root wrote:Solecist Project wrote:There's a chatroom for these people, but I don't know the name. It would be pointless anyway as I can safely assume that it's full of spies. The channel is called anti-ganking. Oops, is it too late to plead the fifth on being a spy?  Quote:Smart move, btw, having a pointless public chatroom for people to build trust and then violate it when it's necessary. Actually, they're not about building trust. Mostly they share terrible advice on everything from fitting a mining ship to proper recruiting practice. Anyone giving good advice tends to get the Spanish inquisition from people like Sarah Flynt and Jennifer en Marland, who seem to dislike anyone disagreeing with their view of things. They also seem to have an obsession with using cloaked ships to surprise gankers, and wanting to camp multiple gates and stations at the same time in the hopes of killing someone who's -5 or below. Their purpose for those camps is to safeguard mining ops - they give you a blank look when you suggest that it would be easier (and require fewer people) to simply camp your own mining op. Quote:Some AntiGankers are probably self righteous delusionalists. (is that even a word? I like it) It means that they believe to be the moral highground and everyone who isn't as good as them ... ... or doesn't agree with them ... ... is somehow bad/etc.
These are bad. Actually worse than most gankers. This is completely true. Even the mere suggestion of pre-emptively ganking an obvious gank fleet will get you into big trouble with these people if the gankers aren't -5 or below. Quote:What's the goal? What are they trying to protect? Miners only or other ships too? System wide action? Whole constellations? Are there "protected" regions? Is there a group with actually larger following? Any religious RP types? Only self righteous losers or actually people who can be taken seriously? Are there actual PR efforts and if so, why don't I know of it? To answer your questions in order: The goal is to sit in a channel being self righteous and throwing a party every time someone whores on a Concord killmail. Apparently, putting ECM on an already perma-jammed, perma-neuted, perma-scrambled ship is a herculean feat worthy of praise from the gods themselves. Primarily it's about "protecting" miners. Most of the killmails they gleefully post in their special little channel didn't save the miner, which makes the celebrations a bit of an odd thing. Maybe they're just sadistic? If they happen across anyone else being ganked they'll happily get involved there, too, with the same end result. Action? Protected constellations / regions? LMFAO! There's always one or two that advocate actually doing something, but at least some of those are glorious agents of the New Order. Dang, one of the true anti-gankers even set them up a mumble server, but the "leaders" of this group consider hanging out on voice comms to be metagaming to an unacceptable level. They aren't a group, more a number of individuals congretating in a channel and an alliance. To date, the largest cohesive "group" I've seen has amounted to Anslo and an alt. They're definitely not into religious RP, though they'd have to praise the saviour as he's the one true highsec deity. Mostly, they seem to be EU nanny state types - CCP should ban ganking, CCP should make sure they don't have to see any mean words in local, CCP should make x, y and z changes to game mechanics to prevent unwanted interaction. There's some people in there that can be taken seriously - you'll find most of them in the minerbumping channel, too. :) PR is mostly word of mouth. Hope that helps with your research. Hello and thank you for your post.
I haven't seen any of these two yesterday and people were actually really happy about my presence. I had quite a few chats and I initiated a quiz and I'm still waiting for somebody to come up with the right answer. Of course it's about ganking. Doesn't matter.
Your view of them is highly +”naccurate, yet partly true. Some people are actually dedicated. Some simply try. Some just want to protect their fellow corpmembers.
If there are any selfrighteous people, I haven't really met them yesterday.
Regarding possibly banning me from their chatroom I can only say that it would be the same as my banning from the minerbumping channel yesterday by some loser who only seems to be equipped with a "125mm" autocannon with really fast RoF.
Their loss. |
|

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
284
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 09:49:00 -
[31] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Solecist Project wrote:Regarding possibly banning me from their chatroom I can only say that it would be the same as my banning from the minerbumping channel yesterday by some loser who only seems to be equipped with a "125mm" autocannon with really fast RoF. Ugh, why on earth were you banned? That really sucks because anyone who's heard of you knows you're a content creator in the emergent department.  Love the description of the guy who banned you, though. That's one to remember! I am suspecting that he is a loyal anon, but I have no proof whatsoever who it was.
I'd suggest unbanning me. :D |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
284
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 11:12:00 -
[32] - Quote
Shederov Blood wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:What is this crap.
Didnt read, dont care.
Suspicious Erotica1 similarity does not go unnoticed however, and is doubly pathetic. Wait, what are you suggesting? Oh dear... Yeah, totally similar. Please don't feed the troll with things that make sense, he'll only crap out nonsense anyway. |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
291
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 14:55:00 -
[33] - Quote
Hi there, pretty lady Jennifer and thanks for your post. :)
You have gotten a few of these quotes wrong. I thought I'll tell you to make sure that there won't be any confusion.
I like confusion, but only if I create it. :D
I was actually pleasently surprised yesterday. I'm still waiting for people to figure out the solution to my question, but this really doesn't belong here.
I really hought that the typically mindless morons would take over, (they exist everywhere) throw baseless accusations around and kill off any change before it can happen.
Wasn't the case! WOOHOO! :D
I sincerely hope we all can get to work together as a group. :D |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
291
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 15:13:00 -
[34] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Jennifer en Marland wrote:Nope, we jam them before Concord arrives, thats the point  Also, I'm guessing that posting successes in a channel containing like minded people probably isn't confined to Anti-Ganking...?  My point is that if the gankers still kill their target it's a failure for anyone trying to prevent it. Celebrating failure seems a bit weird to me - we don't throw a party every time we screw up a gank. :P The delusionalists I have been mentioning and we all agree upon that they exist.
I am really certain thag we can change this, btw.
Question is who will whine about this change.... |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
292
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 15:34:00 -
[35] - Quote
Jennifer en Marland wrote:admiral root wrote:Jennifer en Marland wrote:Nope, we jam them before Concord arrives, thats the point  Also, I'm guessing that posting successes in a channel containing like minded people probably isn't confined to Anti-Ganking...?  My point is that if the gankers still kill their target it's a failure for anyone trying to prevent it. Celebrating failure seems a bit weird to me - we don't throw a party every time we screw up a gank. :P Yes, thats fair enough. People often say 'miner lived' after posting ECM kills, or they're posted by people who I know wouldn't do so if the miner wasn't saved, in which case it's a victory. But I have seen people post kills where they got like 3% damage on a ganker using drones and clearly didn't really make a contribution - I certainly don't agree with celebrating those kills (I might sometimes say 'gj' to be polite!) And yes, there may well be cases where people post ECM kills and 'forget' to mention that the miner still died. solecist project wrote:You have gotten a few of these quotes wrong. I thought I'll tell you to make sure that there won't be any confusion.  Which ones? How are they wrong? Back in 2012 in Hek there were lots of people who proclaimed victory when they managed to scratch me without actually killing me off or preventing anything. I believe that if we give them attention, they get exactly what they want. It's not a good way to deal with them.
I'm glad we agree on this!
Instead, we should make sure that we socially shun those who want to shine through fake achievements and dwarf them with what we can actually come up with!
Regarding the quotes... well, the quote about the delusionists was by me.
It doesn't really matter, now that it's mentioned. :) |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
292
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 17:04:00 -
[36] - Quote
John XIII wrote:Solecist Project, for a small security deposit I can get you back into the minerbumping channel. Sure, how much do you want? |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
292
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 18:41:00 -
[37] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Confirming that whoring in on a CONCORDOKKEN constitutes Anti-ganking.
Anti-ganking would be ganking the ganker BEFORE they ganked..but that would make the anti-ganker a ganker themselves... therefore the only reasonable course of action for an aspiring anti-ganker is to undock and self destruct. This actually happens, but the topic itself is, according to other members, moderated.
loledit i did not mean the self destructing part. |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
294
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 20:29:00 -
[38] - Quote
Maxmillian Rokatansky wrote:Solecist we have something in common, my ganking character was kicked out of MB chat by the same "anon" person that we wont mention.To be fair though I was kicked for commiting a cardinal MB sin. I accused one of their members of carebearism. Whether or not said member was guilty of the infraction didnt seem to make any difference to those with moderator status. I don't know. It's a baseless accusation. He's as good to pick on as anybody else, but I like most of them. I think. ^^
|

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
296
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 23:20:00 -
[39] - Quote
[quote=cynthia greythorne]Au contraire! Three per cent damage on a ganker is significant, because it has a negative effect on the ganker's killboard.[/i]You are overestimating your impact. The target gets killed and that's all that counts.
People want to believe it matters, but it doesn't.
*The target still dies, which is all that matters in the end.*
Quote:Unlike a pure Concord kill, that 3% counts as a loss, which some people find to be painful. Also, for some 'anti-gankers', the point is not to save any one particular miner, but to provide a certain heightened security to all miners. Which is something completely imaginary and only made up.
*The target still dies, which is all that matters in the end.*
Quote:This is accomplished by introducing greater uncertainty to the ganking system: gankers call in reinforcements, or refuse to belt- or gate-gank whilst the 'anti-ganker' is in the system. Yes, but you are overestimating your impact.
Quote:Furthermore, the miners who die are usually the ones in a 0.5 system in a Retriever or Covetor, asleep at the helm, and are really not worth saving at an individual level. They die because they are greedy and lazy and careless. Finally something that's actually connected to reality.
Quote:We all do as we think best. Yes, but most of you do not actually share a common goal, even if it seems that way.
You are ineffective and look at things that do not actually matter in the big picture.
You are ignoring the reality that all that matters is that the targets die.
Taking your post, it isn't about protecting miners, but about the attempt to give back "pain", while actually ignoring the reality that 99% of them do not matter, because ...
... the target still dies. |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
297
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 00:38:00 -
[40] - Quote
This reminds me of all those weirdos who keep claiming that somebody is QQing although there is no reason to believe that this is the case.
They'll just keep saying 'cry more noob', completely ignoring actual reality.
That's an exaggerated analogy, btw.
This thread provides no room for a discussion about this.
Hard fact is that the ganker gets what he wants and that you are not actually protecting anybody.
The ganker gets what he wants. The ganker moves somewhere else.
I can in no way or form consider you to be actually serious, even if you want to tell yourself that you are.
There is no reason to assume that you have contributed to his decision that he moves somewhere else.
I am strongly inclined to believe that you are mostly stroking your ego, but you're might not even be aware of that.
Anyhow ... thank you for your contribution. |
|

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
298
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 10:29:00 -
[41] - Quote
cynthia greythorne wrote:You're welcome, Project! I am sorry to see that you had to resort to insults, but you know what they say about that.  And maybe you are right. Maybe my efforts are useless, but I am enjoying myself. Anyhow....all things considered, I shall not trouble you any longer, here, or in any other thread. If I may offer a bit of advice, be more open-minded and less---how shall we say?-- full of yourself.  I didn't actually mean to insult you, sorry for that. I also think though, that you are partly projecting. |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
298
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 10:33:00 -
[42] - Quote
Shederov Blood wrote:cynthia greythorne wrote:be more open-minded and less---how shall we say?-- full of yourself.  Well I wouldn't want to be full of someone else.  While *I* agree, I'm sure hetero females and homosexual men would disagree. xD |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
298
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 10:50:00 -
[43] - Quote
Alyth Nerun wrote: What I really would like to see is some RP anti-gankers who really start playing the roles of the rebels. This would probably be a lot of fun for both sides. And I mean RP without the usual hurr durr, the male reproduction organs and the fecal matter stuff.
Thank you for your post! Always nice to hace CODE members contribute, as you represent a part of the whole "other side".
I'm not sure the RP thing is a good idea. It would most possibly lead to the ****** up situation you are in with James, although you probably don't recognize it as such.
What it definitely supports is attracting individuals that will use peolle for their own gains, like Erotica. No idea if you people ever figured that her "contribution" only served herself.
That you want "rebels" mirrors your stance regarding the power and authority of the New Order. Imaginary. It's not there. It's you who are the "rebels". People like Erotica with her sick interest for power might have had an influence on this perception, though. It wouldn't wonder me the slightest.
Anyhow, to not come across the wrong way...
It's much harder for the AG to unite, compared to the NO. The biggest reason is the fact that James massively prpfitted from the lowest-hanging-fruit factor, which made it easy to attract people who simply love to attack the lowest hanging fruits. He presented an opportunity to annoy people without suffering from CONCORD.
The AG does not have such an option. Ghe only lowest-hanging-fruit people they possibly could have are those who believe that they somehow hurt gankeds by not actually achieving anything besides imaginary inflicted pain on the ego of the ganker.
I can't tell if I can bring my point across properly. I don't mean to offend you, btw. You do know yourself that there are many who are happy with picking on somebody, but AGs as a theme lack a way of properly attracting and utilizing these. For now.
Please understand that there is no insult behind this. |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
301
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 13:45:00 -
[44] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:A pirate finds his way into the Anti-Ganking chat channel, hilarity ensues. F Reported, because your post only serves as ad for your blog.
When I saw that you posted, I thought you would have probably something interesting to say.
Yet again, you are just... you. |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
301
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 14:36:00 -
[45] - Quote
I congratulate you for your intelligence. :) |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
301
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 14:39:00 -
[46] - Quote
Solstice Project wrote:A ganker can succeed by showing up anywhere, any time, and ganking anything.
While anti-gankers can certainly interfere with some of a ganker's activities, I can't imagine they could ever have the sort of omnipresence needed to make even one system "safe" from ganking. So I'm not convinced any achievable anti-ganking goal would be worthy of the effort required.
(Nice character name, by the way.)
Hi! ^^
I wondered when my former self would show up.
Thank you for the post. That you can't imagine omnipresence is normal, because it's not really achieveable. Ganking isn't omnipresent either, so that's not an issue.
I just realized that you sound familiar. ^^ |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
302
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 15:13:00 -
[47] - Quote
Solstice Project wrote:Solecist Project wrote:I just realized that you sound familiar. ^^ I've always thought so.  I'm glad you recognize yourself. xD |
|
|
|